On cars, old, new and future; science & technology; vintage airplanes, computer flight simulation of them; Sherlockiana; our English language; travel; and other stuff
HERE ARE ALL the makings of a good whodunit: A da Vinci original. Or is it? A beheaded English king passes it on. But is he the only royal involved? A Saudi prince buys it. Or does he? An Abu Dhabi museum is to have an official unveiling. But calls it off.
And where is Salvator Mundi anyway? Nobody in the know is talking.
Here, in Parts 1 and 2, today and tomorrow, are details of this caper.
David D. Kirkpatrick piques our interest with “A Leonardo Made a $450 Million Splash. Now There’s No Sign of It,” in The New York Times, March 30, 2019.
According to Oxford art historian Martin Kemp, Salvator Mundi, Latin for “Savior of the World,” has been termed “kind of a religious version of the Mona Lisa.”
A Beheaded Owner. The painting is one of two similar works listed as belonging to King Charles I of England prior to his execution in 1649.
This is getting juicy, isn’t it? Indeed, other royals may be involved: King Louis XII of France, Charles II and James II of England, and perhaps another.
A Muddled Provenance. Salvator Mundi disappeared from art history in the late 1700s. Then it turned up in the collection of a 19th-century British industrialist. Or was it acquired by Sir Charles Robinson, etcher, museum curator, art collector, and connoisseur, for the Cook Collection in 1900? Or are these two acquisitions one and the same?
Kirkpatrick notes, “It had been so heavily painted over that ‘it looked like a drug-crazed hippie,’ Professor Kemp said.” The painting was attributed at the time to Bernardo Luini, one of Leonardo’s assistants. In 1958, it was sold out of that collection for the equivalent of $1350 in today’s dollars.
How Many Thumbs? After a New Orleans auction in 2005, two art dealers brought Salvator Mundi to the attention of Dianne Modestini, professor at New York University’s Institute of Fine Arts.
Notes Kirkpatrick, “She stripped away overpainting, repaired damage made by a split in the wood panel, and restored details. Among other things, one of Jesus’s hands appeared to have two thumbs, possibly because the artist changed his mind about where the thumb should be and painted over the original thumb. It had been exposed by scraping, and Professor Modestini covered the thumb she believed Leonardo did not want.”
Tomorrow in Part 2, we reveal a Russian Connection (are you surprised?), a princely guy nicknamed MbS, and a Louvre in Abu Dhabi. ds
© Dennis Simanaitis, SimanaitisSays.com, 2019