Simanaitis Says

On cars, old, new and future; science & technology; vintage airplanes, computer flight simulation of them; Sherlockiana; our English language; travel; and other stuff

TO A MORE APPROPRIATE KINGDOM, THIS TRULY COULDN’T HAPPEN

A TEXTBOOK is being withdrawn from Saudi Arabian schools because it contains a photo of the late King Faisal, a Saudi prince at the time, signing the UN Charter in 1945. Next to the prince sits Yoda, the diminutive Jedi Master from Star Wars.

Bellwether of the body politic, satire genuinely is.

BBC News Online gives full details: Saudi artist Shaweesh was inspired by a photo of late Egyptian President Anwar Sadat next to Mickey Mouse during a Disneyland visit. Shaweesh is known for his respectful satire (more is out of the question) in this extremely conservative country. And in 2013 he published a series of photographs in which, BBC says, “symbols of American pop culture—ranging from Captain America to Darth Vader—are superimposed onto archive photos of historical events.”

Signing the UN Charter, 1945. Image from Shaweesh/Gharem Studio.

Shaweesh is cited as saying “he included Yoda in the photo of King Faisal—who was then serving as his father Ibn Saud’s foreign envoy—because they were both ‘wise, strong, and always calm.’ ”

As to the photo’s appearance in a social studies textbook, Shaweesh continued, “Someone should have checked the image before printing.”

Whatever are Saudi kids learning?? Image from the Saudi Ministry of Education.

According to the BBC report, Saudi Arabia’s education minister Ahmed al-Issa said a committee was looking into the “unintended mistake.”

Does this raise a question of when a mistake is intended?

This question may seem overtly philosophical, but then, to speak Yoda again: To a more appropriate kingdom, this truly couldn’t happen.

The London Review of Books, September 7, 2017, had a most interesting article on this, “The Saudi Trillions,” by Malise Ruthven. The country is described by Ruthven, a specialist on Islam, as “a place often defined by its contradictions, in which tribal codes of desert and oasis—puritanical, patriarchal, frugal and austere—co-exist and frequently clash with lavish displays of wealth and such emblems of modernity as air-conditioned shopping malls, designer boutiques and six-lane highways flashing with supercharged vehicles exclusively driven by men.”

Among Saudi Arabia’s Wahhabi Islamic interpretations are strict prohibition of socializing between unrelated males and females, a ban of practicing or proselytizing non-Wahhabi faiths, and a requirement for stores to be closed during prayer times. Modest dress for women is strictly enforced, as is women’s prohibition from driving. Obviously, alcohol and tobacco are banned. And don’t even ask about LGBTQ. In charge of all this social engineering is Saudi Arabia’s religious police, the mutaween, “volunteers,” controlled by the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice.

The seal of Saudi Arabia’s Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice.

Notes the LRB’s Ruthven: “According to foreigners who have lived outside the privileged enclaves of expat colonies…. the sense of fear is ubiquitous.” Ruthven quotes a Brit academic who taught English in the kingdom: “Meeting and talking with Saudis, one soon perceives the fear that lurks behind the smiles, the sense that people are constantly aware of being watched, censored and condemned.”

All this promotion of virtue and prevention of vice hasn’t prevented carnage in Saudi Arabia’s relatively brief (only since 1932) history. Ruthven cites “horrors… similar to the violence committed by Islamic State or al-Quiada today.” Also noted: “According to the now disbanded Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association, one in every six hundred Saudis is in jail because of their opinions or political activities. Since the whole judicial system is based on confessions extracted under torture or the threat of torture, it is physical violence, not the Quran, that is the ‘true foundation of the law.’ ”

With this crowd, Yoda would not likely be seen again. Image from dailymail.co.uk.

Think the Republic of Gilead in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaiden’s Tale. And think hard. ds

© Dennis Simanaitis, SimanaitisSays.com, 2017

2 comments on “TO A MORE APPROPRIATE KINGDOM, THIS TRULY COULDN’T HAPPEN

  1. Michael Rubin
    September 23, 2017

    Look no further than the Senate race in Alabama with the former state court justice waving a Bible and calling for “God’s law” and not “the laws of man.” A rare opportunity to agree with DT and hope for the appointed successor for little Jeff Sessions to win the election.

  2. Bill Urban
    September 25, 2017

    A reference to Saudi trillions brings to mind another contradiction. Those trillions still aren’t enough to keep three of their cities – Riyadh, Al Jubail, and Dummam – off the World Health Organization’s list of “The 20 Worst Cities Worldwide For Air Pollution.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: