Simanaitis Says

On cars, old, new and future; science & technology; vintage airplanes, computer flight simulation of them; Sherlockiana; our English language; travel; and other stuff


I ENJOY the time-gobbling hobby of building virtual GMax craft for use in Microsoft Flight Simulator. So it is with interest that I read the article “Video Games: The Bad, the Ugly, and the (Potentially) Good,” by Michaela Jarvis, in AAAS Science magazine, March 31, 2017.

In all candor, the term “video game” is eschewed by whackos such as myself: “It’s not a game. It’s a simulation”.

And, in fact, this admittedly alternative-fact reality was likely one of the subjects discussed at a March 15, 2017, Neuroscience & Society event sponsored jointly by AAAS and the Dana Foundation, a private philanthropic organization supporting brain research through grants, publications, and educational programs.

According to AAAS author Michaela Jarvis, 155 million Americans play video games at least three times a week. She cites the prediction that “ ‘internet gaming disorder’ will become part of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, this document helping mental-health professionals categorize such matters.

Image from

One of the topics discussed at the AAAS/Dana event was a ReSTART program directed to those whose gaming has led to disruption of their lives.

Notes Jarvis, “The typical client at ReSTART treatment center is young, male, depressed, anxious, sleep-deprived, failing in school or at work, poorly developed physically, unfamiliar with normal dating relationships—and living every possible moment in front of a screen.”

Treatment includes a sabbatical from gaming that lasts for 45 to 90 days, followed by a slow reintroduction to screens. The point is to replace “a main source of their self-esteem (their gaming prowess) and develop a new identity through a healthy lifestyle, work, communications workshops, and instruction in life skills such as grocery shopping and cooking, and counseling.”

Image by the Farside.

A second topic discussed was what researchers call “an indisputable causal link between violent video games and aggressive behavior.”

I confess I’m a bit put off by the word “indisputable” in a scientific setting, but I’ll excuse social scientists this charming conceit. After all, I like to believe Watson wrote Holmes’ chronicles; Doyle was merely his literary agent.

Jarvis addresses whether it’s merely more violent people being attracted to such games. Specialists, she notes, account for this in the design and execution of their studies. Also, she notes, “A new, recently accepted study … shows the effect is basically the same across the United States, Australia, Germany, China, Japan, Croatia, and Romania.”

Purely as a sample of one, Wife Dottie has long believed that my driving style is more aggressive when I fool with my World War I combat sim.

Don’t try this at home, kids. We’re professionals. Image of my GMax Douglas World Cruiser in Microsoft Flight Simulator.

On the other hand, researchers have a good thing to say about strategy-based games, as opposed to those involving pure action. Notes Jarvis, “Preliminary research has suggested that ‘if the target is to improve older adults’ cognitive control, reasoning, and higher-order cognitive skills, and stave off dementia and Alzheimer’s as long as possible, then maybe strategy games are the way to go.”

I admire the scientific caution of this statement. And, after perfecting my flight sim carrier landings (talk about time-gobbling…), I can concur that I feel more cognitive, for sure. ds

© Dennis Simanaitis,, 2017

5 comments on “THIS VIDEO GAME IS ON ME

  1. jlalbrecht64
    April 10, 2017

    “155 million Americans play video games at least three times a week” – Wow. That’s depressing. We have so many problems that need a bit of time from the public to solve, and nearly half the country is playing video games.

    • simanaitissays
      April 10, 2017

      Agreed. Let’s hope they’re all not playing at the same time thrice weekly.

  2. J Perry Arnott
    April 10, 2017

    “I’ll excuse social scientists this charming conceit” Sir, I have to suggest that “social science” is a conceit. That usually just indicates a field in which the normal rules of science are not applied.

    And, yes, I have a degree in a field which has been described since the 1950s as a “social science”. You do what you have to in the pursuit of funding, I suppose.

  3. William Jones
    April 11, 2017

    In regards to your aggressive driving: do you place the symbol of the enemy marques on your cowl as the Great Dir Nigel Shiftright did?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: