Simanaitis Says

On cars, old, new and future; science & technology; vintage airplanes, computer flight simulation of them; Sherlockiana; our English language; travel; and other stuff

DICTIONARIES—DULL, DRY, AND MUSTY?

SAMUEL JOHNSON’s A DICTIONARY of the English Language, 1755, is anything but dull. Nor is Ambrose Bierce’s A Devil’s Dictionary, 1911, at all dry and musty. The tradition is maintained by today’s Merriam-Webster Dictionary, but for a different reason: gender.

Here are tidbits on these three lexicographic endeavors.

Samuel Johnson, 1709–1784, English writer, poet, playwright, essayist, moralist, literary critic, biographer, editor, and (whew!) lexicographer. Portrait by Joshua Reynolds, c.1772.

Samuel Johnson’s “Oats.” According to Wikipedia, Johnson’s A Dictionary of the English Language “had a far-reaching effect on Modern English and has been acclaimed as ‘one of the greatest single achievements of scholarship.’ ”

The title page of the original, 1755. See also Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language, edited by Alexander Chalmers, Studio Edns, 1994.

Examples of Johnson’s wit are abundant: “Oats: a grain which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people.”

“Monsieur: a term of reproach for a Frenchman.”

It was Johnson who also remarked, “Depend upon it, sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in the fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.”

Ambrose Gwinnett Bierce, 1842–1914, American short story writer, journalist, poet, and Civil War veteran.

Ambrose Bierce’s “Egoist.” Bierce’s witty comments were plagiarized for years before being gathered into books. He published The Cynic’s Word Book in 1906 and an expanded version as A Devil’s Dictionary in 1911. The American Revolution Bicentennial Administration named A Devil’s Dictionary as one of “The 100 Greatest Masterpieces of American Literature.”

The Unabridged Devil’s Dictionary, Ambrose Bierce, edited by David E. Schlutz and S.T. Joshi, University of Georgia Press, 2002.

Here are samples of Bierce’s lexicographic skills: “Egoist: A person of low taste, more interested in himself than in me.”

“Love: A temporary insanity curable by marriage.”

“Marriage: A household consisting of a master, a mistress, and two slaves, making in all, two.”

“Conservative: A statesman who is enamoured of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others.”

“Positive: Mistaken at the top of one’s voice.”

This last one reminds me of a great Ring Lardener passage in his book The Young Immigrunts, 1920: “Are you lost daddy I arsked tenderly.” “Shut up he explained.”

Merriam-Webster’s “They.” As reported by Jacey Fortin in “When Dictionaries Wade Into the Gender (Non)Binary,” The New York Times, September 20, 2019, the pronoun “they” has received an update entry in Merriam-Webster. The word’s added new sense: “used to refer to a single person whose gender identity is nonbinary.”

Fortin adds, “Nonbinary people do not identify as either male or female.”

By the way, Merriam-Webster says “binary,” as in ”two things or parts,” dates from fifteenth century Middle English. It’s related to the Late Latin binarius, from Latin bini two by two.

Fortin asks whether Webster-Merriam’s 21st century “they” is “a powerful statement about evolving understandings of gender identity” or is it “something much more elementary: a reflection of changing times.”

“The dictionary, after all,” Fortin writes, “is more a rearview mirror than a vanguard of change, said Peter Sokolowski, an editor and lexicographer with Merriam-Webster.”

In the same article, Fortin cites Laura A. Jacobs, a therapist in New York who focuses on L.G.B.T.Q. clients “and whose preferred pronouns include she, he and they—or none at all.”

Image by Robin Rayne Nelson/Zuma Press, via Alamy, from The New York Times, September 20, 2019.

Fortin writes, “ ‘I think this is a sign of the times,’ Mx. Jacobs said.”

Mx? Merriam-Webster cites Olivia Goldhill, a Quartz philosophy and psychology journalist: “The word ‘Mx’ was first suggested in the late 1970s as a feminist word for those who didn’t want their gender to be revealed in their title, and there are many men and women who use Mx for similar reasons today.”

And some folks haven’t even got used to Ms. yet. ds

© Dennis Simanaitis, SimanaitisSays.com, 2019

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: