Simanaitis Says

On cars, old, new and future; science & technology; vintage airplanes, computer flight simulation of them; Sherlockiana; our English language; travel; and other stuff


ARE YOU back into vinyl yet? Or were you ever into vinyl?

B.C.D., Before Compact Discs, the vibrations of sound that we call music were shared by a wiggly spiral groove on a piece of pressed vinyl plastic. Well, actually, two grooves; one on each side. A needle followed the groove as the vinyl rotated; its vibrations got translated into sound. “Records,” we called them.

Then, in the early 1980s, along came compact discs and an entirely digital interface. The music’s original sound gets translated into digital data representing its frequencies; the compact disc stores these data; its CD player recognizes all these 0s and 1s and magically transforms them back into music.

CDs are quite amazing technology, particularly to those of us who remember a vinyl record’s susceptibility to dust, scratches and inevitable wear.


The question of format gets into more than size.

However, things become complex with the Internet and its easy transfer of data. There’s the legal matter of ownership and piracy, a digital copy being indistinguishable from the original. And there’s the audiophile’s problem of “lossy compression.” In general, the various methods of lossy compression involve reducing the amount of data with (relatively) little loss of content.

If the digital content happens to be music, the term “relatively” becomes relative indeed. What’s inaudible to my (tin and 70-year-old) ear could well be an audiophile’s difference between acceptable and unacceptable sound.

One partial solution to this compression shortcoming is to avoid streaming, downloading, sharing and other means of computer-associated transfer. The original CD contains all the information.

But even then, there’s the audiophile’s dilemma. By its very nature, music is a collection of vibrations, not a bunch of 0s and 1s. Ever since the invention of CDs, audiophiles have complained that a CD’s rendering lacked warmth, veracity, immediacy.

What has evolved is a real dichotomy: those happy with streaming digital and its compression; and those increasingly returning to the vibrating groove of a vinyl record.

Hardcore high-buck audiophiles have lots of fun with this. The world’s most expensive turntables cost upwards of $100,000—and this is only the gizmo that spins the record. At $1500, the VPI Traveler Audiophile turntable is considered entry-level high-end.


VPI Traveler Audiophile turntable, left; Sony PS-LX300USB, right.

For my modest needs, a Sony PS-LX works fine for less than $100. At the moment, it’s wired into an Apple iMac. I use the latter’s GarageBand to transfer selected old vinyl into digital format that ends up on my iPod, iPhone and occasionally on CD.


My iMac’s GarageBand handles the vinyl to digital conversion.

I suspect there are loads of other ways to accomplish this task, but this happens to be the technique I first stumbled on. And, as Emile Levassor said about his car’s gearbox design, “C’est brusque et brutal, mais ça marche…” (“It’s rough and brutal, but it works…”).

Like many of a certain age, we have hundreds of vinyl records. Some are past their care-about date (“The Exotic Sounds of Arthur Lyman”). Others are sufficiently worn to buy a new CD (“Jazz at Oberlin”). Others have yet to appear in commercial CD, though curiously are available as MP3 downloads (Daruis Milhaud’s “Globetrotter Suite/Joys of Life”).


Vinyl 10- and 12-in. LPs (“Long Playing”), 33 1/3 rpm. From left to right, “The Exotic Sounds of Arthur Lyman at the Crescendo,” (meh?); “Jazz at Oberlin: The Dave Brubeck Quartet,” (worn, replaced in CD); “Milhaud: The Globetrotter Suite, The Joys of Life (Homage to Watteau),” (savor the original).

And there’s one that I’m sure the right audiophile would love: “Sonographic Series on the Road. No. 1. The Edwardian Monsters.” This record has the sounds of a 1907 20.5-liter Métallurgique Maybach, 1908 11.5-liter Napier, 1908 12.0-liter Itala and 1911 10.5-liter Cottin et Descoutes.

Talk about warmth and immediacy. ds

Dennis Simanaitis,, 2013

2 comments on “LISTENING TO VINYL

  1. JaguarJoe
    August 6, 2013

    The first time I heard a CD I could tell it was inferior. Without looking I’m sure I could determine if I was listening to a CD or vinyl. The sound wasn’t as clear and crisp. A violin on vinyl is no violin on a CD.

  2. Anton Thortzen
    September 29, 2013

    As a lover of music (mainly classical – including some Copland) and a child of the 50s I never ditched my vinyl records, but I do appreciate the convenience and the noise-free reproduction of a CD disc when played on a decent and serious stereo system, but I always miss the warmth of a vinyl record.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: