Simanaitis Says

On cars, old, new and future; science & technology; vintage airplanes, computer flight simulation of them; Sherlockiana; our English language; travel; and other stuff

PUTTING SCIENCE IN PERSPECTIVE

MARCIA MCNUTT IS PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. Academy of Sciences (and, from 2013 to 2016, editor-in-chief of AAAS Science journals including this magazine).

Marcia Kemper McNutt, Minneapolis-born 1952, American geophysicist and 22nd president of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences. Image by Cmichel67 in 2023 from Wikipedia. 

McNutt writes an Editorial in Science, November 15, 2024, titled “Science is Neither Red Nor Blue.” Its many cogent insights address current events. Here are several gleaned from this Editorial.

The Importance of Science. “Long before the 5 November US presidential election,” McNutt writes, “I had become ever more concerned that science has fallen victim to the same political divisiveness tearing at the seams of American society. This is a tragedy because science is the best—arguably the only—approach humankind has developed to peer into the future, to project the outcomes of various possible decisions using the known laws of the natural world.”

This ability of projecting “outcomes of various possible decisions using the known laws of the natural world” is critically important—and is neither red nor blue. It is simply reality.

Covid, an Example. “Whether conservative or liberal, citizens ignore the nature of reality at their peril. A recent example is the increased death rate from COVID-19 (as much as 26% higher) in US regions where political leaders dismissed the science on the effectiveness of vaccines.”

I pause here to ponder the sheer idiocy of Trump’s picking an anti-vaccine advocate to the cabinet position monitoring health and human services.  

Science’s Challenge. “For starters,” McNutt says, “scientists need to better explain the norms and values of science to reinforce the notion—with the public and their elected representatives—that science, at its most basic, is apolitical. Careers of scientists advance when they improve upon, or show the errors in, the work of others, not by simply agreeing with prior work.”

On Science Improving Itself. This point of science improving itself calls for amplification. Again, Covid provides an example: Attacks on Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the time, were largely ignorant of changing conditions—and evolving knowledge—of this global infection’s early stages. 

Getting Politicized. In retrospect, Wikipedia writes, “During the COVID-19 pandemic, Fauci served under President Donald Trump as one of the lead members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force. His advice was frequently contradicted by Trump, and Trump’s supporters alleged that Fauci was trying to politically undermine Trump’s run for reelection.”

Yes, and Trump in the meantime was suggesting bleach as a curative.

Seeking Trust. “Scientists,” McNutt suggests, “should better explain the scientific process and what makes it so trustworthy, while more candidly acknowledging that science can only provide the best available evidence and cannot dictate what people should value.”

Fish, Farm, or Both? As an example, she says, “Science cannot say whether society should prioritize allocating river water for sustaining fish or for irrigating farms, but it can predict immediate and long-term outcomes of any allocation scheme. Science can also find solutions that avoid the zero-sum dilemma by finding conservation approaches to water management that benefit both fish and farms.”

Informing Decision-makers. McNutt says, “Although scientists must never shirk their duty to provide the foundation of evidence that can guide policy decisions and to defend science and scientists from political interference, they must avoid the tendency to imply that science dictates policy.”

She continues, “It is up to elected officials to determine policy based on the outcomes desired by their constituents. It is the role of science to inform these decision-makers as to whether those desired outcomes are likely to result from the policies being enacted.” 

And, of course, we as constituents must strive to understand implications of these actions. Thus far, some have been woefully inadequate in this. 

McNutt concludes, “The scientific community must fight scientific mis- and disinformation as though lives depended on truth and trust, because they do.” ds

© Dennis Simanaitis, SimanaitisSays.com, 2024

4 comments on “PUTTING SCIENCE IN PERSPECTIVE

  1. Mike Scott
    November 29, 2024
    Mike Scott's avatar

    That a cadre of Bible-thumping bigots, misogynists, homophones, ill-read/unread simpletons has struck a nerve with so many of their fellows, fodder support for the very billionaires using them, to the extent we must fight for science–including in our K-12 trailing that of at least 16 other modern industrial democracies — would’ve been unfathomable as our nation became not just a superpower, but the globe’s superpower, continuing through Sputnik in 1957, the moon landing a dozen years later, MIT’s “Future Factory” Media Lab where we learn to enhance and rebuild lives, alleviate suffering, saving the oceans, fount of all life,

    is tragic. How far so much of our nation has recently plummeted that we must fight for knowledge.

    Thank you for this vital post, which should be made readily available to all Americans.

  2. Fred
    November 29, 2024
    Fred's avatar

    it’s difficult to convince

    • bstorckbf7ce0b8f9
      November 29, 2024
      bstorckbf7ce0b8f9's avatar

      Being raised in the footsteps of Pasteur, Ley and Darwin, I’ve been confused by being shamed for questioning settled science, asking for background of ALL THE SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS WHO AGREE, wondering where the supporting data and studies are published, or basically not blithely being in complete acceptance of an officially mandated dictum.
      I thought Science was collecting all data, objectively weighing all input, and being willing to consider alternatives.
      I recall when all the experts once agreed that maladies were caused by evil spirits and bad air; when there was no doubt that the earth was flat; and when no one could see any benefit in recognizing zero as a numeral.

      • simanaitissays
        November 30, 2024
        simanaitissays's avatar

        Yes, an important point is that science evolves.

Leave a reply to Mike Scott Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.