Simanaitis Says

On cars, old, new and future; science & technology; vintage airplanes, computer flight simulation of them; Sherlockiana; our English language; travel; and other stuff


LET’S CELEBRATE the 100th anniversary of Aston Martin. Let’s also clarify some hype about its dual-fuel Rapide S Hydrogen Hybrid to be raced at next month’s Nürburgring 24-hour. It’ll be a laudable achievement even when the facts are straight.

First, the heritage of this British marque. In 1913, Lionel Martin and Robert Bamford established Aston Martin, “Aston” from the Aston hill climb in Aston Clinton, a Buckinghamshire village about 40 miles northwest of London.


The company’s first heyday came between 1926 and 1937 with the Bertelli cars, most of them open two-seat sports cars designed by Augustus “Bert” Bertelli.


The Aston Martin International is the quintessential British sports car.

A British agent of some note is known to have driven an Aston Martin. Oh, yeah, that one too, but I was thinking of Sir Denis Nayland Smith in his encounters with Fu Manchu.

A second heyday dated from 1947 when industrialist Sir David Brown bought the works. Subsequent Astons carried DB nomenclature, as with James Bond’s DB5.

That same year, the company acquired Lagonda, an even older British marque established in 1906. Founded by American Wilbur Gunn, this company got its name from Lagonda Creek, near Springfield, Ohio, the town of Gunn’s birth.


A familiar Aston Martin, the James Bond DB5; its first appearance in Goldfinger, 1964.

Another noteworthy car appeared in 1976. Futuristically wedge-shaped, the Aston Martin Lagonda was a luxurious four-door that carried electronics far beyond anything sensible at the time.


There were 645 Aston Martin Lagondas built between 1976 and 1990.

The Aston Martin Lagonda wasn’t as ugly as some claimed, but it was unreliable to a fault (typically, an electrical one).

New ownerships came and went, the most significant being Ford’s 1994-2007. That year, British motorsportsman David Richards formed a consortium of American and Kuwaiti interests buying 90 percent of Aston Martin. In 2012, an Italian equity fund invested ₤150 million in buying 37.5 percent of the company. Who knows whether Ford’s ₤40 million stake is still somewhere on Dearborn books.

But enough of international finance. What of the dual-fuel Aston Martin Rapide S Hydrogen Hybrid?


Aston Martin Rapide S Hydrogen Hybrid, readied for the Nürburgring 24-hour race in May 2013.

The Nürburgring race car’s 6.0-liter V-12 powerplant is modified to run on gasoline, hydrogen or any combination of the two. Apart from the publicity value, there’s technical merit in this. Dual gasoline/hydrogen internal combustion makes it a bridge vehicle helping evolution of a Hydrogen Highway and fuel-cell propulsion.

BMW preceded Aston in this regard with its Hydrogen 7 Program ( The German company chose cryogenic storage of liquid hydrogen; Aston selects the less complex high-pressure gaseous form.

According to Aston Martin and Alset Global, the car’s hybrid developer, the goal of its pure hydrogen mode is “to show that a zero emissions lap of the Nordschleife is possible while emitting virtually only water from the exhaust.”

Sorry, guys, “virtually” is a funny word; but this ignores real automotive pollutants, not merely the CO2 that Europeans get all nerdy about.

The harmful pollutants of internal combustion (when fueled by gasoline or diesel) are carbon monoxide, CO; oxides of nitrogen, NOX (two of the “criteria pollutants”) and unburned hydrocarbons, HC (examples of volatile organic compounds, VOCs).

The “Cs” of CO, CO2 and HC are carbon, and hence fueling an internal combustion engine with hydrogen eliminates these three. But the engine still ingests air, which is 78 percent nitrogen and 22 percent oxygen. Therefore, the hydrogen-fuel Aston’s lap of Nürburgring will still emit NOX.

It won’t be much if a NOX-specific catalytic convertor is fitted, but neither will the exhaust be just water. ds

© Dennis Simanaitis,, 2013

One comment on “ASTON MARTIN’S 100TH

  1. Bill Urban
    April 19, 2013

    Dennis, another delightful post. Quintessential understates that work of art, the Aston Martin International. A fender by itself would qualify as art.
    Ford’s foray is reminiscent of their escapade with Volvo. For about ten years ownership of the Volvo car division they paid $4.5B, after which Volvo AB paid ~$1B for the heavy truck division of Renault. That acquisition included the substantial goodwill, dedicated dealer organization, and iconic name of . . . Mack, a Renault subsidiary. And then there’s the $3.5B add’l cash on hand.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


This entry was posted on April 19, 2013 by in Classic Bits, Driving it Today and tagged , .
%d bloggers like this: